
Research: The Case for Touch as Clinical Medicine for Anxiety and Depression
July 22, 2026An Interview · Part Two
Inside the Usui-kai
A second conversation with Wakatake Mamoru — 若竹守
Reiju, denju, and the attunement — a second conversation with a practitioner inside the Usui Reiki Ryōhō Gakkai on what is actually given and received in the original organisation, where the Western attunement may have come from, and why nothing can ever be revoked.
Every answer appears here in English. Beneath each one you’ll find 日本語 — Read the original › — tap it to open Wakatake-san’s answer in his own Japanese.
Wakatake-san, thank you for being here with me again. Our first conversation travelled further than either of us expected, with readers around the world discussing it, and your words about lineage in particular have prompted real reflection. What has the response been like for you? Has anything surprised you, or is there anything you’d like to clarify or add before we go deeper?
First of all, Bronwen, thank you very much for creating this opportunity for us to speak again. I am truly grateful.
The response to our last interview surprised even me. What pleased me most was that my words reached people who had never known me before, sparking their interest in what the Usui-kai臼井会 actually is.
Many people could not hide their surprise at the fact that there is no keitō-zu系統図 (lineage chart) in the Usui-kai. Furthermore, the practice of transitioning seamlessly into a treatment right after performing Hatsurei-hō発霊法 (a method to invoke spiritual energy) seemed to be a fresh surprise for many readers. Seeing these reactions, I realized once again that the Reiki霊気 of the Usui-kai is fundamentally different from the various forms of Reiki in the West.
As I have mentioned before, the difference in how a shihan師範 (master instructor) in the Usui-kai and a “Teacher” in the West are viewed also became very clear through this response.
A shihan in the Usui-kai works strictly within the Usui-kai, taking on the role of cultivating members. They do not give reiju霊授 (spiritual energy transmission) privately to individuals, nor do they become independent. Naturally, they do not make money from it either. Because the responsibility is so heavy, there are actually people who say they do not want to become a shihan.
On the other hand, I hear that in Western Reiki, when someone becomes a Teacher, they can become independent, have their own clinic or school, and recruit students. And then they are incorporated into a keitō-zu themselves, aren’t they? Comparing these two, I feel that there is indeed something fundamentally different.
With all this in mind, let’s have another enjoyable conversation today. I am really looking forward to it.
日本語 Read the original answer ›
まずはブロンウェンさん、再びこのような対話の機会を作っていただき、本当にありがとうございます。心から感謝しています。
前回のインタビューは、私自身も驚くほどの反響がありました。特に嬉しかったのは、これまで私のことを全く知らなかった人たちにまで言葉が届き、「臼井会とは一体どのような組織なのか」と興味を持ってもらえたことです。
多くの人が驚きを隠さなかったのは、臼井会には「系統図」が存在しないという事実でした。また、発霊法を行った後、そのままシームレスに治療へと移行するという点も、多くの読者にとって新鮮な驚きだったようです。こうした反応を見て、私も改めて「臼井会の靈氣は、西洋の様々なレイキとは根本的に違うところがある」と実感しました。
以前からお話ししていた通り、臼井会における「師範」と、西洋における「ティーチャー」に対する考え方の違いも、今回の反響を通してはっきりと分かりました。
臼井会の師範は、あくまで臼井会の中で働き、会員の育成を担う存在です。個人に対して私的に霊授を行ったり、独立したりすることはありません。当然、それによってお金儲けをすることもありません。責任が重いため、実は「師範にはなりたくない」と言う人さえいるほどです。
一方で、西洋のレイキでは、ティーチャーになると独立し、自分のクリニックやスクールを持ち、生徒を募ることができると聞いています。そして、自らが系統図の中に組み込まれていくのですよね。この二つを比べると、やはりそこには何か根本的に違うものがあると感じています。
これらを踏まえた上で、今日もまた色々と楽しいお話をしていきましょう。どうぞよろしくお願いします。
Let’s get straight into it then. You used the word reiju霊授 just now, and in our first conversation you mentioned that the reiju-shō (certificate) names a denju-sha (one who transmits the teachings). In the system of Reiki outside the Usui-kai, we tend to think in terms of “initiation” as a single ritual event, after which transmission is complete. But I have the sense that reiju means something much wider than that, it’s not a moment but everything: the teaching, the ongoing relationship.
Is that right? What does reiju actually encompass in the Usui-kai?
First of all, as always, please note that this is not the official view of the Usui-kai臼井会, nor am I a spokesperson for the organization. I am simply sharing my own experiences and personal thoughts based on my learning within the Usui-kai.
First, let me explain the terminology. We have a kenkyūkai研究会 (training gathering) twice a month, and at this kenkyūkai, we always receive reiju霊授 (spiritual energy transmission) from a shihan師範 (master instructor). It takes a very short time, only about one to one and a half minutes.
On the other hand, there is a reiju-shō靈授証 (reiju certificate). In the past, this reiju-shō recorded the date the reiju was received and the name of the reijusha霊授者 (the person who gives reiju). However, the modern format uses the word denju伝授 (initiation or transmission). What used to be written on the certificate as “giving reiju” is now written as denju, and it lists the name of the shihan in charge at that time as the person from whom you received the denju. The shihan whose name is written is simply the one who happened to be in charge of the denju at that particular time.
Now, in the Usui-kai, we differentiate between the reiju received from a shihan at every kenkyūkai and the denju that takes place whenever one advances to a higher rank.
This denju is probably close in nuance to what is called an “attunement” in Western Reiki. However, it differs from Western Reiki in that there is almost no ritual involved. For example, when you are simply advancing in rank, your rank goes up just by attending that kenkyūkai.
At the level of Okuden奥伝 (inner teachings), you are taught the shirushiおしるし (symbols). In some cases, you receive a transmission of them, and you are taught their meaning and how to use them. That is all there is to it. The regular reiju is not performed here, so in a sense, I believe the word denju is used to mean the act of being taught these things.
日本語 Read the original answer ›
まず初めに、今回も同様ですが、これは臼井会の公式見解ではありませんし、私は臼井会のスポークスマンでもありません。あくまでも、私が臼井会で学んできた中での体験や、個人的な考えをお話ししているという点をご理解ください。
まず用語の説明をします。
私たちには月に2回の研究会がありますが、その研究会では必ず師範から霊授を受けます。これは非常に短い時間のもので、1分から1分半くらいです。
一方で「靈授証」というものがあります。かつてこの靈授証には、霊授を受けた日と霊授者が書かれていましたが、現代の書式では「伝授」となっています。かつては「霊授する」と証書に書かれていたものが、今は「伝授」という書き方に変わり、伝授者として、その時の担当の師範の名前が書かれています。この担当の師範の名前は、その時たまたま伝授の担当となった師範の名前が書かれるだけです。
さて、臼井会では、研究会ごとに行われる師範からの「霊授」と、等級が上がるたびに行われる「伝授」とを使い分けています。
この「伝授」は、おそらく西洋レイキにおける「アチューンメント」のニュアンスに近いものです。しかし、西洋レイキと違うのは、ほとんど何の儀式もないということです。例えば、単に級が上がるだけの時は、その研究会に出席したというだけで等級が上がります。
奥伝の時は、おしるし(シンボル)を教えてもらい、場合によってはそれが伝授され、その意味と使い方を教えられます。ただそれだけのことです。ここでは普段行われているような霊授は使われませんから、ある意味、これら(教えやおしるし)を教えてもらうということで「伝授」という言葉が使われているのだと思います。
In your opening you mentioned that the responsibility of being a shihan in the Usui-kai is so heavy that some members do not wish to take it on. What does that responsibility actually involve? What does a shihan carry that makes people hesitate?
Bronwen, here is my answer to your question.
In the Usui Reiki Ryōhō Gakkai, becoming a shihan師範 is not a certification for personal achievement or a tool for business. It is a lifelong duty of service.
The heaviest part of this responsibility is the absolute preservation of the teachings. A shihan must pass down Usui Sensei’s exact methods without adding personal interpretations or mixing them with other practices.
A shihan is also required to dedicate a massive amount of their personal time to the Gakkai. In addition to guiding members and performing reiju霊授, they also provide teate手当て (hands-on healing) and enkaku遠隔 (distant healing) when requested by members. Furthermore, branch shihans are responsible for booking venues and making all other preparations for the kenkyūkai研究会 (study meetings) held a few times a year when the President visits from Headquarters. This is all done entirely on a volunteer basis with no financial reward. They cannot use the title to market themselves or seek fame.
There is also a crucial difference from Western Reiki: a shihan does not have “their own students.” We are all strictly taught by the Gakkai itself.
It requires setting aside personal ego and making sacrifices for the sake of the tradition. Because this strict adherence and the burden of responsibility are so heavy, many dedicated members prefer to remain regular practitioners rather than take on the role of shihan.
日本語 Read the original answer ›
臼井靈氣療法学会において、師範になることは個人の達成の証やビジネスのための資格ではありません。それは生涯にわたる奉仕の義務です。
この責任の最も重い部分は、教えを完全に守り抜くことです。師範は、個人の解釈を加えたり他の手法と混ぜたりすることなく、臼井先生の本来の手法をそのまま伝えなければなりません。
また、師範は学会のために膨大なプライベートの時間を捧げる必要があります。会員の指導や霊授を行うだけでなく、会員から依頼されればお手当てや遠隔も行います。さらに支部の師範となれば、年に数回、本部から会長が来られる際の研究会の会場予約や様々な諸準備も担います。これらは完全にボランティアであり、金銭的な見返りはありません。その肩書きを使って自己宣伝をしたり名声を得たりすることも許されません。
そして、西洋レイキとは決定的に異なる点があります。それは、師範には「自分の生徒」という存在はいないということです。私たちは皆、あくまで「学会から教えてもらう」のです。
個人のエゴを捨て、伝統のために自己犠牲を払うことが求められます。この厳格な規律と責任があまりにも重いため、多くの熱心な会員は、師範という重荷を背負うよりも、一人の一般会員として実践を続けることを選ぶのです。
Before we go further, one detail in your earlier answer about the certificates fascinates me: you said the certificates themselves changed: what was once written as reiju, given by a reijusha, is now written as denju, from a denju-sha. Do you know when or why the Usui-kai changed its own wording? Was it a deliberate shift in how the transmission was understood?
In English we would distinguish between a “transmission”, something passed on from one person to another, and an “initiation”, a ritual marking a beginning, or crossing into something new. I know these are our terms, not yours, but does a distinction like that exist within the practice of the Usui-kai itself?
I do not know exactly when it changed, but at the very least, when Mr. Doi joined as a rokutō6等 (6th rank) in 1993, the word denju伝授 was already being used. And the person giving it was listed as the denju-sha伝授者 (the person who gives denju).
Furthermore, my reiju-shō靈授証 is different from Mr. Doi’s. His did not have a column for Shinpiden神秘伝 (mystery teachings, the highest level), but my version does. Also, instead of the denju-sha stamping their personal seal, there is only a signature.
However, I heard that there were discussions about changing the format of the certificate prior to 2014, so it must have been updated by the time I joined.
I showed you my reiju-shō before. It has the words “to give denju” at the top, and in the section below, there are columns from rokutō up to Shinpiden. Each has the signature of the denju-sha. In the past, there was no row for the denju-sha at the bottom. It seems that a new certificate was given every time someone advanced a rank. Things change with the times, don’t they?
Although I do not know the specific reason why they made this change, as I mentioned in my previous answer, it is possible that they wanted to clarify the distinction between reiju霊授 and denju伝授. Unfortunately, since there are no records explaining the reason for this change, I cannot say for certain.
日本語 Read the original answer ›
いつ変わったのか私にはわかりませんが、少なくとも土居さんが6等、つまり入会した平成5年(1993年)には「伝授」となっています。そして「伝授者」と記載されています。
私の靈授証はさらに土居さんのものと違って、土居さんのものには神秘伝の欄がありませんでしたが、私のバージョンには神秘伝の欄があります。そして伝授者の印鑑が押されず、サインだけになっていることです。
ただ、2014年以前に証書の書式変更をするような話が出ていたと聞いていますから、私が入会するまでに変更されたのでしょう。
私は以前あなたに私の靈授証を見せましたが、上に「伝授する」という文字とともに、下の欄には6等から神秘伝までの欄があります。それぞれに伝授者のサインが書いてあります。昔は下の欄に伝授者の段がなかったのです。1等級ずつ上がるたびに証書をもらっていたようです。時代とともに変わるものですね。
なぜこの書き換えを行ったのかについては、先ほどお答えしたように、霊授と伝授の意味合いをはっきりさせるためだったのかもしれません。ただ、なぜ書いたのかという公式な記録は残っていないため、はっきりしたことはわかりません。
Wakatake-san, thank you again for showing me your reiju-shō, by the way. Before I ask my next question, let me make sure I am understanding you correctly.
As I understand it now: reiju is a brief bestowal from a shihan, a minute or so, received at every kenkyūkai for every member at every rank, twice a month, for as long as one remains a member. It is not tied to advancement and is never finished. A long-term member will have received it hundreds of times.
Denju is what happens when a member advances in rank, and it is surprisingly plain. For most advancements, rank simply goes up by attending the meeting. At Okuden the o-shirushi are taught and explained, and in some cases transmitted. There is almost no ritual, and reiju is not performed as part of it.
So where the Usui-kai has two separate things, the West fused them into a single ceremony, the attunement, and made that one moment carry everything at once: the teaching, the symbols, the connection, the authority to practise.
Have I understood correctly? Is there anything you would adjust? Because now I have a question about attunements 🙂
Reiju霊授 is a separate matter. Since it is performed every time, it is completely different from the one-time “attunement” in Western Reiki. Furthermore, there is no ritual involved in denju伝授.
You are simply gathered in a corner, shown the shape of the shirushiしるし (symbols), and taught how to use them.
In some cases, you receive a nentatsu念達 (a method of sending Reiki by imbuing it with one’s intention and symbols).
Therefore, it is separate from what is called an “attunement” in Western Reiki. It is very simple and understated.
In my understanding, the “attunement” was something created later on.
According to records, in the past, attending a reiju-kai霊授会 (Reiki transmission gathering) meant that one would advance by one rank. Furthermore, there are old records stating that this reiju-kai was held for five consecutive days, although we do not do that now. In other words, in the past, one had to attend the reiju-kai for five consecutive days to advance by one rank. And in those days, it seems that shihan師範 or daishihan大師範 (grand master instructor) from the Tokyo headquarters would travel to regional areas as the reijusha霊授者 (the person who gives reiju).
日本語 Read the original answer ›
霊授はそれとは別です。これは毎回行われるものですから、一回限りの西洋レイキにおけるアチューンメントとは全く違います。また、「伝授」には儀式のようなものはありません。隅っこに集められて、しるしの形を見せられ、どのような時に使うかを教えられるだけなのです。場合によっては、その霊気に思いやおしるしを乗せて送り込む「念達」が行われます。
ですから、西洋レイキで言うアチューンメントとは別物です。とてもあっけないものです。
私の理解では、アチューンメントは後になってから作られたものだと思っています。
記録によれば、昔は霊授会に出ると1等級上がることになっていました。しかもその霊授会は5日間連続で行われると古い記録に残っているものもありますが、今はそのようなことはしていません。つまり昔は1等級上がろうとすれば、5日間連続の霊授会に参加しなければいけないことになっていました。そして、昔は霊授者として、地方には東京の本部から師範や大師範が赴いていたようです。
Coming back to the shihan’s duty for a moment. You describe the shihan’s heaviest duty as passing down Usui-sensei’s exact methods, unchanged. Yet your own research shows how much has changed despite everyone’s best intentions: the certificates reworded, the headquarters and its records burned, teachings carried by kuden, the five-day reiju-kai discontinued.
Is perfect preservation actually possible? Or is the shihan’s duty better understood as an ideal that each generation strives toward?
That is the real dilemma, isn’t it?
When you trace what actually happened — the burned records, the rewritten certificates, the shift to oral teachings — it is obvious that an exact, point-for-point replica of what Usui-sensei did is practically impossible.
That is why I do not see a shihan’s duty as blindly copying outer forms. It is more about chasing the core spirit while accepting the reality of change. We aim for the ideal, knowing we have to adapt, and the real value is in keeping that core alive honestly.
However, we have almost no original records left to look back on.
That is precisely why we must look back now. What was there in the beginning? This is also a journey to find our origins. Of course, some members and shihans are not interested in such things, but a few of us care deeply, so we choose to examine our roots.
日本語 Read the original answer ›
そこが本当のジレンマですよね。
実際に何が起きたかをたどっていくと、記録の焼失、書き換えられた証明書、口伝への移行などがあり、臼井先生がやったことの正確な完全コピーが事実上不可能だというのは明白です。
だからこそ私は、師範の責務を「外側の形を盲目的に模倣すること」だとは思いません。変化という現実を受け入れつつ、核となる精神を追い求めることだと思っています。適応せざるを得ない現実を知りながら理想を目指し、その核を誠実に生かし続けることこそに価値があると考えています。
しかしながら、私たちには振り返るべき原点の記録がほとんど残されていません。
だからこそ、今ここで振り返るのです。もともと何があったのか。これは私たちの原点を探す旅でもあるのです。もちろん、会員や師範の中にはこうしたことに興味のない人もいますが、私や少数の仲間にはとても強い関心があるため、自分たちの原点をしっかりと見つめ直してみるのです。
Your description of the early reiju gatherings makes me look again at what we know of Chujiro Hayashi, who taught over five days, and Hawayo Takata, who taught over consecutive sessions with an initiation at each one. The Western attunement clearly descends from their teaching, but somewhere along that line in the West the repeated reiju became something else: a formal ceremony, performed a number of specific times per level. You said you understand the attunement to be a later creation. Do you have a sense of where that change happened? With Hayashi-sensei after he became independent, with Takata-sensei, or later still?
Can you share what the purpose of reiju is in the Usui-kai, and why it is repeated rather than given once? I ask partly because of the superstitions that have grown around the attunement in the West. I hear from practitioners who worry they may only receive a certain number per level, that an attunement might fade, or that it could be undone or removed. The Usui-kai’s reiju seems to belong to a different understanding entirely. What would you say to practitioners who carry those worries?
At the very least, there is no “attunement” in the Usui-kai臼井会. However, for Reiki that has gone overseas, there is an “attunement”. This suggests that it was created either when it left the Usui-kai or as it was being taken abroad. I do not know when or by whom it was created.
Regarding reiju霊授 in the Usui-kai, Reiki itself flows through everyone. We are taught that we receive reiju simply to improve its flow.
There are various methods in Western Reiki, and I do not know what their system is like, but if I may speak my mind, it is never revoked or lost. Reiki is constantly flowing. Once it begins to flow, it is never cancelled. I myself have not attended the reiju-kai霊授会 (Reiki transmission gathering) for a long time, but I have never even thought that my Reiki might be revoked. What matters more is to practice Hatsurei-hō発霊法 (a method to invoke and strengthen spiritual energy) repeatedly and actively perform teate手当て (hands-on healing) to cultivate oneself.
There is no need to worry. Also, reiju is simply something beneficial to have. When you think about it, did Usui-sensei臼井先生 himself receive reiju?
日本語 Read the original answer ›
少なくとも「臼井会」にはアチューンメント(西洋レイキの儀式)というものは存在しません。しかし、一度海外へ渡った霊気に関しては、アチューンメントという手法が存在します。つまり、臼井会から離れて海外へ渡った際、あるいは海外へ渡る過程で独自に作られたものだと思われます。それがいつ、誰によって作られたのかは私にも分かりません。
臼井会における「霊授」について言えば、霊気そのものは本来誰にでも流れているものです。ただ、その通りを良くするために霊授を受けるのだと教えられています。
西洋レイキには様々なやり方があり、どのようなシステムになっているのかは私には分かりませんが、私から言えることは、霊気が取り消されたり消えたりすることなど決してないということです。霊気は常に流れています。一度流れ始めれば、それがなくなることはありません。私自身も長い間「霊授会」に顔を出していませんが、霊気が取り消されるなどと思ったことすらありません。むしろ大事なのは、普段から「発霊法」を何度も行い、積極的に「手当て」を行って自分自身を鍛えていくことです。何も心配する必要はありません。また、霊授は「あれば良い」というものです。よく考えてみてください。臼井先生ご自身は、誰かから霊授を受けていたのでしょうか?
So true. You say Reiki flows through everyone, and that once it begins to flow it is never cancelled. May I ask: at what point do you consider that Reiki begins to flow? Or was it always flowing?
That is a very insightful question. I have heard the same from my shihan師範:
Reiki flows through everyone from birth. However, receiving reiju霊授 strengthens that flow. It is a simple mechanism where Reiki flows as long as one is alive, and reiju enhances it. The flow only ceases when life ends.
On the other hand, Tomita Kaiji富田魁二 of Tomita Reiki富田霊気 (a system proposed by Tomita, student of Usui) proposed a different theory. He suggested that once Reiki is taken into the body, its state depends on the individual’s physical condition, and it can be depleted through use. Therefore, he argued that it is necessary to replenish it, and that the fukujin副腎 (adrenal glands) and jinzō腎臓 (kidneys) are the parts of the body responsible for producing Reiki.
My personal view is different; I believe Reiki is not something that is produced or depleted within the individual body, but rather something that constantly fills the world. Tomita-sensei’s theory seems to approach Reiki more like a physical energy that must be managed within the human body.
日本語 Read the original answer ›
私自身も師範から教わったことですが、霊気は生まれた時から誰の体にも流れています。ただ、霊授を受けることによってその流れがより強くなるのです。つまり、生きている限り霊気は流れ続けており、霊授はそれを活性化させるシンプルな仕組みに過ぎません。流れが止まるのは、命を終える時です。
一方で、富田霊気を提唱された富田魁二氏は、「体に取り込まれた霊気は、個人の体の条件に左右されるため、使い続けると不足する」という説を唱えました。そのため、不足分を補う必要があり、その生成部位は副腎や腎臓であるという独自の理論を展開しています。
私個人の考えとしては、霊気は個人の体内で生産・枯渇するものではなく、常に世界に満ちているものだと捉えています。富田氏の説は「霊気を個人の身体エネルギーとして物理的に管理する」という西洋的なアプローチに近いかもしれませんね。
Yes, I agree with you as to how I understand and experience Reiki. I think there are probably different levels of control that people feel they need to have with energy work.
In our first conversation you showed that Tomita’s practice was almost identical to the Usui-kai’s, and now you show his theory was quite different. Do we have any records showing what Mikao Usui’s own theory might have been?
When Tomita Kaiji冨田魁二 published his first book, Reiki to Jinjutsu: Tomita-ryū Teate Ryōhō霊気と仁術 冨田流手あて療法 (Reiki and the Benevolent Art — Tomita-Style Hands-on Therapy), his method of shuyō修養 (self-cultivation) truly retained the vestiges of early Usui Reiki臼井靈氣. However, by the time the second edition was released, Tomita had developed his own original ideas. He began to emphasize the importance of the fukujin副腎 (adrenal glands). This is where his unique “Tomita flavor” became prominent. But since his roots are in Usui Reiki, his work is still very useful as a reference.
What can we learn from the books of Tomita and Eguchi Toshihiro江口俊博? The reason we read their books is that they both originally belonged to the Usui-kai臼井会 and later became independent from it. Their early methods seem to strongly reflect the exact practices of the Usui-kai.
The reason we study their methods is that the early practices of the Usui-kai have not survived. Because they are lost, we have to look from the periphery and deduce, “It was probably like this”. We can presume that what is common to their methods is likely the practice of early Usui Reiki臼井靈氣.
The methods that remain in the Usui-kai today, along with Tomita Reiki冨田霊気, Eguchi Reiki江口霊気, and what I call “Yoshida Reiki吉田霊気” — the methods of Yoshida Hiromu吉田弘 who wrote about Te no Myōyō手の妙用 (The Miraculous Use of Hands) — are all highly valuable references.
There are no historical materials from 1922 until Usui-sensei’s passing in 1926. It is said that the headquarters burned down during the Great Tokyo Air Raids, and all the documents were lost at that time. However, I believe that not every daishihan大師範 or shihan師範‘s house burned down, so as long as they haven’t been thrown away, some documents must still exist somewhere. But since it seems the teachings were primarily passed down through kuden口伝 (oral transmission), it makes finding written materials even more difficult.
One of my goals is to discover the origin of the current methods used by the Usui-kai.
日本語 Read the original answer ›
冨田さんが1冊目の本(『霊気と仁術 冨田流手あて療法』)を出した時、その修養の仕方はまさに初期の臼井靈氣の面影を残すものでした。しかし第2版が出た時は、冨田さんは自ら独自の考えを持つに至っています。それが副腎の大切さを強調しだしたのです。ここで冨田色が強まるのです。しかし、根っこは臼井靈氣なので、やはりあの方(の著書)はとても参考になります。
冨田さんの本、それともう一つ、皆さんは江口さん(江口俊博)の本からどのようなことを学ぶのでしょうか?どうして皆が江口さんや冨田さんの本を読むのかと言うと、彼らはかつて臼井会に属しており、そして臼井会から独立したからです。彼らの初期のやり方には、臼井会のやり方そのものが強く現れていると思われます。なぜ彼らのやり方を勉強するのかと言うと、臼井会の初期のやり方が残っていないからです。残っていないからこそ、周辺から見て「おそらくこうだろう」と推測していくのです。彼らのやり方に共通しているものが、おそらく初期の臼井靈氣のやり方だろうと推測できます。
今、臼井会に残っている方法と、冨田霊気や江口霊気、あるいは私が「吉田霊気」と呼んでいるように、『手の妙用』を描いた吉田弘(よしだひろむ)さんのやり方もとても参考になります。
1922年から臼井先生が亡くなる1926年までの間の資料は何もありません。東京大空襲で本部が焼けてしまったと言われています。その時に資料も全部なくなってしまったと言われています。しかしながら、大師範や師範の家すべてが燃えたわけではないと思うので、どこかに捨てられていない限り、書類は残っているのではないかと思います。ただ、どうやら口伝で行われていたようなので、余計に資料が見つかりにくいのです。
私の目的の一つは、現在の臼井会のやり方の源流を知りたいということでもあるのです。
I wanted to come back to something you said, that at Okuden the o-shirushi are simply taught, shown in a corner, but that in some cases one receives a nentatsu念達 of them. I am genuinely curious about this.
What makes the difference between the two cases, and does receiving the o-shirushi in this way carry any special meaning for the member? Also does everyone in the Usui-kai work with the o-shirushi?
For the Usui-kai臼井会, the o-shirushiおしるし (symbols) are like tools. They do not have powerful names like kotodama言霊 (words endowed with spiritual power). They simply have the name of the o-shirushi and its shape. You are shown a sample, you practice drawing it, you are taught its meaning, and you are taught when to use it.
However, the o-shirushi is not absolute. It is merely a tool.
Also, when nentatsu念達 (transmitting thought or intention) is performed, I believe it is done so that the o-shirushi is firmly engraved in the mind.
When is nentatsu performed and when is it not? They probably do it all the time. However, when things are busy and hectic, they might not have the time to get around to doing nentatsu.
By the way, regarding how to perform nentatsu, if you look at very early documents, it states that nentatsu is considered a kuden口伝 (oral transmission). Since nentatsu is just nentatsu, I do not understand why it is specifically referred to as a “kuden”. Whether there was some secret method or not, this is something that actually appears in the very early documents of the Usui-kai. This is another mystery that I must solve.
These o-shirushi, as tools, are all used entirely for treatment. They are tools for healing.
Furthermore, the person who passes on the techniques is called the sōke宗家 (head master of the art). Usually, the president concurrently serves as the sōke, but sometimes a person who is not the president becomes the sōke. Such a person sometimes performs teate手当て (hands-on healing) without using the o-shirushi at all. It is very simple.
As for hibikiヒビキ (the sensation or resonance of a block or illness), they said that instead of actually placing their hands on the body, they can tell where the hibiki is just by standing in front of the person and moving their hands slightly.
The president and the sōke of the Usui-kai take the initiative to perform teate themselves. The shihan師範 also perform distant healing for the members. This is how the Usui-kai continues its healing practices. Of course, they aim for spiritual elevation, and they believe that attaining happiness for oneself and others through healing is what is truly important.
日本語 Read the original answer ›
おしるし(シンボル)は臼井会にとって道具のようなものです。言霊のような力ある名前はありません。単におしるしの名称と形があるだけです。そして見本を見せられて書く練習をし、意味を教えられ、どんな時に使うのかも教えられます。しかし、おしるしが絶対ではありません。単なる道具のようなものです。また、念達(ねんたつ:意念を伝えること)をされる時は、しっかりとおしるしが頭に刻印されるようにとのことだと思います。
どんな時に念達をされて、どんな時に念達をされないのか。おそらく念達はすべて(の機会に)するのでしょう。ただ、忙しくてバタバタしている時は念達まで手が回らないことがあるのかもしれません。
ちなみに念達のやり方ですが、これはごく初期の文書を見てみると、念達について「口伝(くでん:口頭による伝承)」ということになっています。念達は念達なのに、どうしてわざわざ「口伝」となっているのか、その意味もわかりません。何か秘密のやり方があったのかどうなのか、これは本当にごく初期の臼井会の文書に出ていることです。これも私が解明しなければいけないことですね。
このような道具としての「おしるし」も、すべて治療のために使います。治療の道具です。
また、技を伝える人、「宗家(そうけ)」と呼ばれる人ですが、通常は会長が宗家を兼任していますが、会長でない人が宗家になる時もあります。そのような人は「おしるし」を使わずにお手当てをすることがあります。非常にシンプルです。
「ヒビキ(ひびき:病腺の反応)」も、実際に手を当てていくのではなく、本人の前に立って少し手を動かすだけで、どのあたりに響きがあるのかわかると言っていました。
臼井会の会長や宗家の方は自ら率先してお手当てをするのです。また、師範(しはん)の方も会員のために遠隔でお手当てをするのです。このように臼井会は治療を続けています。もちろん精神的向上を図り、そして治療を通じて自他共に幸せになる、それが大切だと思っています。
One small clarification: when nentatsu is done at Okuden, is it performed on the member by the shihan, or is the member being taught how to perform nentatsu themselves?
To answer your clarification: nentatsu念達 is something the practitioner is taught how to perform themselves, rather than a ritual performed on them by the shihan師範.
Actually, I was taught nentatsu regardless of whether I was at the Okuden奥伝 level or not. In essence, it is simply one of the treatment methods.
Since nentatsu literally means conveying one’s thoughts or intentions, we perform it by sending Reiki infused with a specific wish. For example, during tanden chiryō丹田治療 (tanden treatment), we send Reiki with the clear intention and thought, “May this illness heal.”
In Western Reiki, I understand it is generally taught that you should not mix your own intentions with the Reiki energy, though I have heard that there are some lineages within Western Reiki that also utilize this nentatsu method.
In the traditional Usui-kai臼井会, this wasn’t presented as a strict, level-dependent secret. Instead, I was taught this method naturally by the shihan during our regular, everyday hands-on healing practice sessions.
日本語 Read the original answer ›
確認に対するお答えですが、念達は師範から会員に施される儀式ではなく、実践者自身が行う方法として教わるものです。
実のところ、私は奥伝という段階に関係なく念達を教えてもらいました。要するに、それは数ある治療法の中の一つの方法なのです。
念達とは、文字通り「自分の思いを伝える」ことですから、例えば丹田治療を行う際などに、「病気が良くなりますように」としっかりと念(意図)を込めて霊気を送ります。
西洋レイキでは、霊気エネルギーに自分の意図を混ぜるべきではないと教えられるのが一般的だと認識していますが、私が聞くところによると、西洋レイキの中にもこの念達法を取り入れて使っている流派があるそうですね。
伝統的な臼井会では、この技法を段階によって厳密に分けられた秘密の儀式として扱うのではなく、日頃のお手当ての練習の中で、師範からごく自然に教えてもらいました。
In an interview with WL Rand in 2014 for Reiki News Magazine, Hiroshi Doi said “Usui-sensei had no standard curriculum and the length of time of each training was dependent on the spiritual progress. It is said that he gave one-on-one lectures mainly on the right mental attitude needed for spiritual advancement based on his own experience. As it was personal only, fragmentary notes of his words written by his student have been found.”
Might this be similar to what you have called denju? From everything you have studied, including what can be deduced from the periphery, does anything support or contradict that picture?
First, let me clarify the definition of the words. The Japanese word denju伝授 traditionally means “to transmit or pass down (den伝)” and “to grant or bestow (ju授)” teachings and secrets from a master to a student. In the Usui-kai, this word is specifically used to mean the bestowal of a rank, such as granting the 6th Kyu or Okuden Zenki. Regardless of whether a ritual is involved, it is easier to understand denju simply as bestowing a rank. Anything other than that is called reiju霊授. Reiju is a practice conducted every time at our kenkyūkai研究会 to improve the flow of Reiki.
Now, regarding Mr. Doi. To me, he is not so much a teacher as he is a dear fellow student who studied side-by-side with me in the Usui-kai. I have the utmost respect for his wonderful achievements in spreading Reiki to the world.
However, regarding the story you asked about — that Usui Sensei taught one-on-one in the early days — the historical facts are a bit different. The truth is, there are absolutely no records remaining from 1922 to 1926. Even in the book Reiki Ai no Hikari霊気 愛の光 (The Light of Reiki Love), compiled during Koyama Sensei’s time, which contains accounts from people directly taught by Usui Sensei, there is no mention of such a thing.
Therefore, if Mr. Doi did say that, I myself am very curious to know what sources he based it on, and I would love to see them if they exist. That is how completely absent those historical records are, even within the Usui-kai. I was genuinely surprised to hear this story for the first time through your question.
I often feel that in the West, fragments of Mr. Doi’s words are taken out of context and take on a life of their own. I wonder if his true intentions were misunderstood, or if something he stated as a hypothesis was passed along as a “fact.” Currently, Mr. Doi is not in a position to speak directly to everyone and explain things himself. For that very reason, I feel it is not his true intention to have his fragmented words treated and spread as absolute truths. After all, we are all human, and memory lapses or miscommunications can happen to anyone.
As a fellow member who studied in the Usui-kai, I just wanted to be fair and make the facts clear. Think about it: if there were any surviving records of how reiju was performed while Usui Sensei was alive, can you imagine how overjoyed everyone in the Usui-kai would be? But no one has ever seen such a record.
That is the answer.
日本語 Read the original answer ›
ブロンウェン、質問への回答です。
まず言葉の定義についてお話しします。日本語の「伝授(Denju)」という言葉には、古くから「師匠が弟子に教えや奥義を伝え(伝)、授ける(授)」という意味があります。臼井会において、この言葉は具体的に「六等を授けました」「奥伝前期を授けました」といったように、「等級を授けること」を意味して使われます。儀式を伴うかどうかに関わらず、等級を授けることだと捉えた方がわかりやすいでしょう。それ以外のものは「霊授(Reiju)」と呼ばれます。霊授は、レイキの流れを良くするために研究会で毎回行われるものです。
さて、土居さんについてですが、彼は私にとって先生というよりも、臼井会で一緒に机を並べて学んだ大切な仲間です。レイキを世界に広めた彼の素晴らしい功績を、私は心から尊敬しています。
ただ、今回ご質問いただいた「臼井先生が初期に1対1で行っていた」というお話については、事実として少し事情が異なります。というのも、1922年から1926年までの記録は全く残っていないからです。小山先生の時代に編纂された『霊気 愛の光』の中に、臼井先生から直接教えを受けた方々の貴重な話が載っていますが、そこにもそのような記録は一切ありません。
ですから、もし土居さんがそのようにおっしゃっていたのだとしたら、私自身も「どのような資料に基づいているのだろうか」と非常に興味がありますし、もしあるならぜひ見てみたいと思うほどです。それほどまでに、当時の記録というものは臼井会の中でも見つかっていないのです。今回あなたの質問でその話を初めて聞き、本当に驚きました。
海外では、土居さんの言葉の一部だけが切り取られ、一人歩きしていることが多いように感じます。彼がどのような意図でおっしゃったのか、あるいは仮説として話したことが「事実」として伝わってしまったのではないかなど、真意が上手く伝わっていない部分もあるのではないでしょうか。現在、土居さんはご自身の口で直接皆様に説明できる状況にありません。だからこそ、断片的な言葉だけを捉えて絶対的な真実のように広めてしまうのは、彼にとっても本意ではない気がするのです。人間である以上、記憶違いや言葉の行き違いは誰にでも起こり得ることですから。
同じ臼井会で学んだ仲間として、この事実関係だけはフェアにはっきりさせておきたいと思いました。考えてもみてください。臼井先生が生きておられた当時の霊授のやり方が記録として残っていたら、私たち臼井会の人間がどれほど喜ぶでしょうか。でも、誰もそれを見たことがないのです。
それが答えです。
Tomita and Eguchi are reasonably well known outside Japan as early members of the Usui-kai who later went on to found their own schools. But you also mentioned Yoshida Hiromu, who wrote Te no Myōyō and whose approach you call Yoshida Reiki. He is far less known.
Can you tell us a little about him, and why his work is such a valuable reference?
Regarding Mr. Yoshida, I first learned about him through an acquaintance while I was researching old documents on Reiki therapy. When I finally obtained a copy of his book, Te no Myōyō手の妙用 (The Wondrous Use of Hands), I was amazed by what I found. It describes methods identical to those of the Usui-kai臼井会, detailing his treatment techniques and clinical experiences. Privacy was not much of a concern in those days, so he actually published the real names of the people he healed.
He was a highly educated man who graduated from Kyoto Imperial University (now Kyoto University) and had many connections, including politicians. As you can see from his book, his approach involves placing the hands facing downwards to heal. He also writes very clearly and thoroughly about how to feel hibiki響き (sensations or resonance).
One slight difference from the Usui-kai is his method of drawing the hibiki into his own hands and then dissolving it. Although this differs from the Usui-kai’s exact approach, I was already aware that this type of technique existed among hand-healing practices of that era.
Furthermore, the book states a very important fact: hands-on healing can be performed without the need for symbols (shirushi印) or reiju霊授 (attunements).
The book outlines training methods, which are strikingly similar to those of Usui Reiki臼井霊気. While Mr. Yoshida doesn’t explicitly state where he learned his techniques, it is highly likely that he studied Usui Reiki or something very closely related to it. As I mentioned, he was a well-educated man with a wide network, and since he was born and raised in Gifu Prefecture — the same as Usui Sensei — I am certain he knew of him.
There was a time when I actively researched the connection between Usui Sensei and Mr. Yoshida to understand how he acquired these methods. I even visited the temple where Mr. Yoshida once lived (where I believe his descendants still reside), but unfortunately, the head priest was away, and I couldn’t speak with anyone.
Perhaps because I have spoken highly of this book in various places, Te no Myōyō is now quite difficult to find and trades at very high prices on the antiquarian market. Nevertheless, it is a book I strongly recommend.
Since you mentioned Eguchi and Tomita, I would like to add a few things.
In my impression, Eguchi Reiki江口霊気 (Toshihiro Eguchi) later leaned quite heavily towards State Shinto. However, his method, Tenohira Ryōji手のひら療治, eventually went global as “Palm Healing” through the Macrobiotics network.
As for Mr. Tomita (Kaiji Tomita), his methods are no longer passed down today. I actually visited the site where his house used to be, but the house was gone, and there was only a parking lot. Today, there are no clues left about him other than his writings. If you are going to read Tomita’s work, I highly recommend the 2nd Edition that was published later, rather than the versions currently available overseas. That 2nd Edition is the true masterpiece of Tomita Reiki. I pray that it will be translated soon so that it can reach all of you.
日本語 Read the original answer ›
吉田氏については、私が霊気療法の古い文献を調べていた際に、知人から教えてもらって知りました。そして『手の妙用』を手に入れて読んだところ、驚くべき内容が書かれていました。そこには、臼井会と全く同じ手法が記されており、具体的な治療のやり方や経験が克明に綴られています。当時はプライバシーの概念が希薄だったため、実名を出して「どのような人を治したのか」まで書かれているのです。
彼は京都帝国大学(現在の京都大学)を出たインテリであり、政治家などの知人も多い方でした。この本を読めばわかるように、彼のアプローチは手を下に向けて当てて治していく方法です。そして「響き」をどのように感じるのかについても、しっかりと詳細に書かれています。
ただ、臼井会と少し異なるのは、響きを自分の手に移してから消していくという点です。このやり方は臼井会とは違いますが、当時の手当て療法として、このような手法が存在していたことは私も知っていました。
また、この本には、印(シンボル)がなくても、霊授がなくても手当てができるという非常に重要な事実が書かれています。訓練方法も記されていますが、臼井霊気のやり方にそっくりです。吉田氏がどこでそれを学んだのかは明記されていませんが、おそらく臼井霊気か、それに非常に近いところで学んだものと思われます。先述の通り、彼はインテリで顔が広い人物です。しかも、臼井先生と同じ岐阜県の生まれ育ちですから、臼井先生のことは絶対に知っていたはずです。
私はかつて、臼井先生と吉田氏のつながりや、吉田氏がどのようにその手法を学んだのかを調べていた時期がありました。吉田氏がおられたお寺(現在はご子孫がいらっしゃると思います)を実際に訪ねたこともありますが、あいにくご住職が不在で、お話を伺うことはできませんでした。
私があちこちでこの本の話をしたこともあり、今では『手の妙用』はなかなか手に入らず、古書市場でもかなり高値で取引されるようになりました。しかし、これは私が自信を持ってお勧めできる素晴らしい本です。
ちなみに江口霊気(江口俊博氏)については、私の印象では、後にかなり国家神道的な方向へ進んだように感じます。ただ、江口氏の「手のひら療治」は、後にマクロビオティックを通じて「パームヒーリング」という形で世界へ広まっていくことになりました。
一方、冨田氏(冨田魁二氏)のやり方は、現在では継承されていません。私は冨田氏が住んでいた家の跡地も訪ねましたが、すでに家はなく、ただの駐車場になっていました。現在、冨田氏について知る手がかりは著作しかありません。冨田氏の本を読むなら、海外で出版されているものよりも、その後に出た「第2版」を強くお勧めします。これこそがまさに冨田霊気の傑作です。この第2版が早く翻訳され、海外の皆さんの目に触れる日が来ることを祈っています。
Wakatake-san, we have covered so much today: receiving repetitive reiju, denju as the simple transmission of teachings, the historical development of the attunement, and theories about how Reiki might actually work and exist.
So let me close by handing back a question you asked earlier: do you imagine that Usui-sensei himself received some form of reiju?
I do not believe that Usui-sensei received reiju霊授 from any specific person. According to legend, Usui-sensei underwent a twenty-one-day fasting meditation on Kurama-yama鞍馬山 (Mount Kurama). It is said that on the final day, he felt an intense energy, attained enlightenment, and simultaneously acquired the healing ability. Or perhaps he came into contact with the dai reiki大霊気 (the great spiritual energy) mentioned in the legends, and that is how he acquired such power. I do not know for sure.
However, if Reiki is something that inherently flows through everyone, Usui-sensei must have completely resonated the Reiki within himself with the Reiki of the universe, opening his own channel through his severe, life-risking shuyō修養 (self-cultivation). This is my view.
We had a very meaningful exchange of ideas today.
日本語 Read the original answer ›
私は臼井先生が特定の誰かから霊授を受けたとは考えていません。伝説によれば、臼井先生は鞍馬山で21日間の断食瞑想を行い、その満願の日に強烈なエネルギーを感じて悟りを開き、同時に癒しの力を得たとされています。あるいは、伝説の中で語られる大霊気(だいれいき:大いなる霊気)に触れたことで、そのような力が身に付いたのかもしれません。そこは私にも分かりません。
ただ、霊気が本来誰にでも流れているものであれば、臼井先生は自らの命を懸けた厳しい修養によって、自らの内の霊気と宇宙の霊気を完全に共鳴させ、その回路を開いたのでしょう。これが私の考えです。
今日はとても有意義な意見交換ができました。
Wakatake Mamoru — the meaning of the pen name
Wakatake若竹, young bamboo, shoots up quickly. And it is supple, and strong. However hard the wind blows, it bends without breaking, and rises again.
The feeling Wakatake-san has poured into Reiki Ryōhō霊気療法 — that is the wakatake, the young bamboo. And to guard that feeling as it grows, supple and strong — that is mamoru守, to guard.
This is the meaning he has placed in the name Wakatake Mamoru.
To Be Continued …
Next time, we will dive deep into the practical applications and different ways to use O-shirushi, exploring aspects that haven’t been discussed publicly before. There will also be some first-time revelations. Stay tuned!




